The Ways Family Members May Be Enabling an Alcoholic

The Ways Family Members May Be Enabling an Alcoholic Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Print The Ways Family Members May Be Enabling an Alcoholic Games Alcoholic Families Play By Buddy T facebook twitter Buddy T is an anonymous writer and founding member of the Online Al-Anon Outreach Committee with decades of experience writing about alcoholism. Learn about our editorial policy Buddy T Updated on May 24, 2018 Sometimes Scolding Can Actually Be Enabling. © Getty Images More in Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Overcoming Addiction Personal Stories Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Drug Use Nicotine Use As the saying goes, you are not the cause of someone elses drinking problem, you cannot cure it and you cant control it. But there are ways that you may be contributing to the problem. Before placing the blame for all the problems in your family or your relationship on his (or her) drinking, it might be wise to examine how the other persons drinking may have affected you, and how you have reacted to it. For example, does the following statement sound familiar? I dont have a problem with my drinking! The only problem is your attitude. If you would quit complaining about it, there wouldnt be a problem! Well, obviously that statement is not completely accurate; after all denial of the problem is one of the more frustrating facets of alcoholism and addiction. On the other hand, the statement may not be completely false either. How do you react to the alcoholics drinking? Could your reaction be a part of the overall problem? Have you fallen into role-playing in the family? Is there anything that you can do to improve the situation? The following describes an incident that could be an example of alcoholic behavior and some examples of reactions to the incident. Does any of these sound familiar? The alcoholic comes home late and he is drunk, too drunk in fact to get the key into the front door lock. After several futile attempts, he decides that it is a lost cause. Since he does not want anyone in the house to know that he is too drunk to unlock his own door, he makes a brilliant decision that solves his problem. He goes to sleep in the front yard! How would you react? The Rescuer The rescuer doesnt let the incident become a problem. Since she has been waiting up for him anyway, she goes out in the yard, gets the alcoholic up, cleans him up, and puts him to bed. That way the neighbors never see him passed out in the flower bed! She never mentions the incident to him or anybody else. If anyone else mentions it, she denies there is a problem. She lies for him, covers up for his mistakes, and protects him from the world. As the problems increase and his drinking gets worse, she takes on responsibilities that were once his. She may get a job or work extra hours to pay the bills. And if he gets in trouble with the law, she will move heaven and earth to come up with his bail. The Provoker The provoker reacts by punishing the alcoholic for his actions. She either waits for him to wake up the next morning and gives it to him with both barrels, or she goes out and turns the water sprinklers on! She scolds, ridicules, and belittles. She nags. She screams insults at him loud enough for everyone to hear. She gets on the telephone and tells all her friends hes a loser. She is angry and she makes sure that the alcoholic and everybody else knows it. Or she gives him the cold shoulder and doesnt speak to him. She threatens to leave. She doesnt let it go, either. The anger and resentment continue to build as these incidents become more frequent. She never lets him forget his transgressions. She holds it against him and uses it as a weapon in future arguments -- even months or years later. The Martyr The martyr is ashamed of the alcoholics behavior and she lets him know it by her actions or words. She cries and tells him, Youve embarrassed us again in front of the whole neighborhood! She sulks, pouts, and isolates. She gets on the telephone with her friends and tearfully describes the misery that he has caused her this time! Or she is so ashamed of it she avoids her friends and any mention of the incident. Slowly she becomes more withdrawn and depressed. She may not say much about it to the alcoholic, but she lets him know with her actions that she is ashamed of him. Quietly she tries to make him feel guilty for his behavior. The Enabler The above examples may be somewhat of an exaggeration, but then again they may be very typical of what goes on in an alcoholic home. The role the nonalcoholic spouse plays in the family may not be as well defined, as they are outlined here. Depending upon the circumstances, the spouse may fall into one of these roles or may switch back and forth between them all. So which of the spouses described above is an enabler? Which one is actually helping the alcoholic progress in his disease? Which one, although they are trying to make things better, are actually contributing to the problem? All of them. Find out how each of these reactions to the alcoholics problem is enabling and learn how to respond to the latest episode without becoming a part of the problem. This quiz can help you understand how your behavior is enabling an alcoholic friend or family member.

How Dogs are Helping Cheetahs

Dogs have long been considered mans best friend, but their characteristics of loyalty and protectiveness have also earned them the lesser known title of cheetahs best friend. Thats right; dogs are being used more and more frequently to assist in conservation efforts to preserve the endangered cheetah both in captivity and in the wild. Dogs at the Zoo Since the 1980s, the San Diego Zoo Safari Park has assigned companion dogs to cheetahs that are involved in the zoos captive breeding program. Janet Rose-Hinostroza, animal training supervisor at the Park, explains: A dominant dog is very helpful because cheetahs are quite shy instinctively, and you cant breed that out of them. When you pair them, the cheetah looks to the dog for cues and learns to model their behavior. Its about getting them to read that calm, happy-go-lucky vibe from the dog. The primary goal of comforting cheetahs through this unusual partnership is to make them at ease in their captive environment so that they will be able to breed with other cheetahs. Shyness and anxiety dont bode well for a breeding program, so the inter-species friendships that the cheetahs are able to form with dogs can actually benefit the long-term survival of this rare cat. The dogs enlisted by the Park are typically rescued from shelters, giving these homeless canines a new purpose in life. My favorite dog is Hopper because we found him at a kill shelter and hes just 40 pounds, but he lives with Amara, whos our toughest cheetah by far. Its not about strength or overpowering. Its about developing a positive relationship where the cheetah takes her cues from the dog. Cheetah cubs are paired with canine companions at about 3 or 4 months of age. They first meet on opposite sides of a fence with a keeper walking the dog on a leash. If all goes well, the two animals are able to meet for their first play date, although both are kept on leashes initially for safety. Were very protective of our cheetahs, so the introduction is a painfully slow process but a lot of fun. There are lots of toys and distractions, and theyre like two cute little kids who desperately want to play. But cheetahs are instinctively hardwired to feel uneasy so you have to wait and let the cat make the first move. Once the cheetah and dog establish a bond and prove to play well without leashes, they are moved into a shared living space where they spend almost every moment together, except feeding time, when the zoos dogs get to gather, play, and eat together. The dog is the dominant in the relationship, so if we didnt separate them, the dog would eat all the cheetahs food and wed have a really skinny cheetah and a really chubby dog. Among the zoos crew of companion mutts is one purebred Anatolian shepherd known as Yeti. Yeti was recruited to help cheetahs and also to act as a sort of mascot, representing her cousins in Africa who have revolutionized predator management and saved many cheetahs from being killed in defense of livestock. Dogs in the Wild The Cheetah Conservation Funds Livestock Guarding Dog Program is a successful, innovative program that has been helping to save wild cheetahs in Namibia since 1994. While Anatolian shepherds in Namibia do not work in cooperation with cheetahs, they still contribute to the wild cats survival. Before the dogs were employed as conservation tools, cheetahs were shot and trapped by ranchers who were trying to protect their goat herds. Dr. Laurie Marker, founder of the Cheetah Conservation Fund, began training Anatolian shepherds to protect the herds as a non-lethal predator management strategy, and since then, wild cheetah populations have been on the rise.

1st and 2nd Amendment - 1723 Words

The First and Second Amendments of the United States Constitution On September 25, 1789, The Bill Of Rights was submitted to the states for approval, based on the previous Constitutions insufficient assurances for civil freedom, liberties and justice. Concerned that the Constitution neglected to clearly state the basic civil rights of the citizens of the United States, Anti- Federalists opposed the Articles of Confederations, which gave state governments more authority (â€Å"Bill of Rights, n.d.). As a result the first tem amendments commonly known as The Bill of Rights was approved by congress in 1791, undeniably guaranteeing citizens of The United States essential and important rights. The 1st and 2nd amendments are perhaps the most†¦show more content†¦The 2nd amendment of the constitution maybe one of the most infamous and controversial modification of the charter. The 2nd amendment protects a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms the law states, â€Å"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State , the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, and shall not be infringed.† (â€Å"Second amendment† n.d.). The American Bar Association (â€Å"Bill of Rights† 1791) has stated that â€Å"there is more disagreement and less understanding about this right than of any other current issue regarding the Constitution. It is a confusing right and can be inferred in many ways and is interpreted accordingly with each case. The definition of the right to keep and bear arms is one of the most argued amendments in the constitution because some state the right refers to militia and their right of bearing arms to uphold and protect the security of a free nation when needed. While others believe the amendment gives each and every individual the right to keep and bear arms. However one construes the amendment, it has been a great topic of concern, argument and debate, ever since it has been ratified. The federal government has approved guidelines on gun ownership which includes registration of all guns, proof of ownership and a clean background check. Immense portions of the population are in opposition of gun control and feel individual gun ownership is a constitutional right that should not be limited or controlled.Show MoreRelatedGun Control Is Constitutional Or Unconstitutional892 Words   |  4 Pagesthe 2nd amendment and how it relates to the federal government. Blek tries to validate his statements by claiming the NRA abuses the 1st Amendment to give false information about the 2nd Amendment. He argues that the distortion from the NRA diverts the focus from the health and safety risks related to gun violence (Blek pg.2). However, Sobran goes on to argue that the federal government has no right to impose gun laws, using the 2nd amendment as his point of reference. He claims that the 2nd AmendmentRead MoreCapital Punishment Essay666 Words   |  3 Pageseffective and innoc ent men may be murdered. They may also argue that it is not fairly administered between the races. It can also be argued that it violates the 8th amendment, which forbids cruel and unusual punishment, and also the 14th amendment, by taking away life. But supporters can argue that the death penalty does not offend any amendments because it is a suitable punishment and the offenders went through due process of law. The early, barbaric methods of execution included crucifixion, boilingRead MoreThe Bill Of Rights Is Outdated1573 Words   |  7 Pagesretain an important role in American society and outlines specific freedoms for all Americans. They are essential to preserving our individual rights while ensuring freedom for our future generations. The Bill of Rights is the name for the first ten Amendments of the United States Constitution. This limits the power of the U.S. Federal Government. Those limitations protect our natural God given rights and ensure no man or government will be able to obtain excessive power and infringe them. Some of theseRead MoreGun Control And The Rights Of A Free State1462 Words   |  6 Pagesinfringed,† many will recognize this as the 2nd second, however, few will know the true purpose for why it was written. The intent of the amendment was to allow the general populace to own personal firearms without restriction, so that, in the case of a government takeover or attack on their well being, they would be able to defend themselves. Regrettably, this has largely been forgotten. A vast majority of the left now believes that the 2nd amendment is just an excuse for conservatives to play withRead MoreEvolution Of Lincoln s Policy On Slavery Essay1573 Words   |  7 Pagesbefore back in the 18 00s. Considering the fact that Abraham Lincoln ended slavery, in order to have achieve this he created many policies to permanently put slavery to a final end. Some of these policies were: The Gettysburg Address, the Thirteenth Amendment, Emancipation Proclamation, and so on. Slavery was a serious problem that needed a solution and he just so happened to be the type of man that never quit to achieve what he wanted or thought what was right until he achieved his goal. This is a greatRead MoreThe Bill Of Rights Vs. Des Moines Independent Community School District1274 Words   |  6 Pagesover time, at the federal and state level, with a focus on civil liberties, The 1st Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that, â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances† (First Amendment). Over time, this has been interpreted as the government can neither impose a stateRead MoreCompromise Between Federalist And Anti Federalist Essay885 Words   |  4 Pagesratification of the U.S Constitution in 1787 and 1788. The biggest compromise that was made would be the federalist including agreeing to include bill of rights in the Constitution. We need a new constitution because of inequality because in the 1st amendment it say there is freedom of religion and speech, expression, assembly and the right of petition. But I doesn’t give freedom on access. Also, because it was outdated was written in 1787. The concerns the Anti-Federalist had were on Article II ofRead MoreThe Smoking Should Be Banned860 Words   |  4 Pages On August 31, 2008, Maine made the law for no smoking in cars with children under 18. Warnings were given out until 2009 of September 1st; but starting September 2nd of 2009, fines of fifty dollars would be given out if caught by police. The making of t his aw, is to limit teenagers with their license to stop smoking in cars. Smoking should be banned in motor vehicles in all states if person is/are over 16 of age. For teens, smoking is a distraction just like talking on the phone or texting whileRead MoreIllegal Immigration and the Federalist System Essay1281 Words   |  6 Pageslaw, a Constitutional Amendment was proposed in a joint resolution by Senator David Vitter of Louisiana on January 25th, 2011 that would change the parameters defining a U.S. citizen thereby making citizenship ultimately more difficult to attain (112th Congress, S.J. Res. 2). The issue of illegal immigration is sure to be a focal point for many congressional sessions to come . In addition to federal regulations, the states are granted reserved powers by the 10th Amendment , and those powers canRead MoreGun Control and the Second Ammendment to the Constitution Essay544 Words   |  3 Pagesto learn to be able to be around gun without the worry but those who use gun inappropriately shouldn’t have the guns. The Second Amendment says people have the right to carry concealed handguns. Judge Richard Posner said â€Å"must be interpreted to include a right to have a concealed gun in public, to have it ready for use, and have it for self defense†. The Second Amendment also says â€Å"a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms

Congestive Heart Failure Free Essays

Congestive heart failure, also called CHF or heart failure, is a serious and complex disease in which the heart muscle has been damaged or has to work too hard because of heart disease and other conditions, such as obesity. Although the heart continues to beat, the damaged heart muscle is too weak to efficiently pump enough oxygen-rich blood to and from the body, resulting in potentially life-threatening congestion in the lungs and other tissues of the body. Congestive heart failure is a common complication of heart attack and other types of heart disease that damage the heart muscle. We will write a custom essay sample on Congestive Heart Failure or any similar topic only for you Order Now These diseases include hypertension, heart valve disorders, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy. Congestive heart failure can also be caused by anemia. In general, congestive heart failure affects both the left and right sides of the heart, but it can affect one side more than the other, depending on the location and severity of damage. In left-sided congestive heart failure, the left side of the heart is damaged and unable to effectively pump blood from the heart to the body. This results in blood backing up into the lungs and increasing blood pressure in the lungs. The increase in pressure causes a buildup of fluid in the lungs, which can lead to a life-threatening condition called acute pulmonary edema. In right-sided congestive heart failure, the right side of the heart is damaged and unable to effectively pump blood flowing from the body back to the heart. This results in a backup of blood and an increase in pressure in the veins that carry blood from the body to the heart. In turn, this leads to swelling (edema) of the lower extremities and sometimes of other areas of the body. Acute congestive heart failure, in which fluid builds up rapidly in the lungs and causes pulmonary edema, is an immediately life-threatening condition that can quickly lead to respiratory failure, cardiac arrest and death. Immediate emergency treatment best minimizes the risk of these and other serious†¦ How to cite Congestive Heart Failure, Papers

Sauls Enthronement A Popular Choice, A Prophetic Coup, Or A Personality Cult Essay Example

Sauls Enthronement: A Popular Choice, A Prophetic Coup, Or A Personality Cult Essay The content of I Samuel 8-12 outline Saul the first king of Israels rise to power, and as B.C. Birch points out 1 Samuel especially chapters 8-12 are crucial in any attempt to understand the development of the Israelite kingship, as this is practically the only written source recording the transformation from tribal league to a monarchy.1 However, the accounts within these chapters are inconsistent making any attempt to understand the emergence of the monarchy troublesome, as differing interpretations can be attributed to it. When evaluated in the light of theories of state formation these accounts on the whole are inconsistent with what is known about the complex processes of state formation through archeology and anthrolology. Although, in a more implicit manner they are suggestive of a premonarchic Israel proposed by recent theories of state formation. According to V. P. Long 1 Samuel 8-12 is a complex literary challenge2, as the rise of the monarchy in is accounted for in five differing pericopes (chap.8; 9.1-10.16; 10.17-27; 11; 12), all of which contain contradictory information, both in events and attitudes to the monarchy itself.3 Two of the pericopes (chapters 8 12) talk about kingship in general with no reference to Saul, whilst the other three (9.1-10.16; 10.17-27; 11) outline his election to the kingship. Although two or possible three of the pericopes present the monarchy in a favourable light the Deuteronomistic editors change this impression by framing the pericopes with chapters 8 and 12 which through the speech and attitude of the Prophet Samuel reflect their negative opinion of the monarchy.4 We will write a custom essay sample on Sauls Enthronement: A Popular Choice, A Prophetic Coup, Or A Personality Cult specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Sauls Enthronement: A Popular Choice, A Prophetic Coup, Or A Personality Cult specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Sauls Enthronement: A Popular Choice, A Prophetic Coup, Or A Personality Cult specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Sauls enthronement according to the biblical texts could be interpreted in many differing ways. It was a popular choice in that the elders request Samuel for a king in both chapter 8 and 10.17-27, although this request in chapter 8 was not for any specific person. According to D. V. Edelman the peoples request for a king was based on the realisation that Israel needed to move away from the insecure judgeship to a more permanent leadership represented by the dynastic monarchy.5 Certain physical chracteristic were often a requisite for kingship in the surrounding nations of Israel and reference are also made to Sauls height and physical chractersitics (9.2; 10.23), so perhaps this too may account for his accention to kingship through his kind of popular appeal. In 9.1-10.16., however, this request does not appear, instead it is implied the initiative for the establishment of the monarchy came from Yahweh, who chooses Saul. The evidence for Sauls enthronement being a political coup is perhaps signified here in that a local unknown seer who later turns out to be Samuel rises to fame because he was instrumental in Sauls rise to kingship. In the other accounts, however, in the event of Sauls election Samuels position as Judge is undermined, although he retains his position of intermediary to Yahweh. Sauls enthronement could also be seen as a personality cult, for in chapter 11 he is portrayed as a charismatic leader, when military prowess earns him the kingship, and here too Saul is proclaimed King by popular consent. It is this pericope that N. P. Lemche believes to be the most credibility account of Sauls election, even though it is very similar to other accounts of heroic deeds in the book of Judges, for in I Samuel 10.17-27 Saul is elected king through lot, the use of which according to Lemche seems very unlikely in deciding such an important issue.6 The question is however, how does the above relate to recent theories of state formation in Israel. Many of the traditional histories of early Israel are in most cases just rehashes of the biblical texts, and due to the lack of clear archaeological evidence for the rise of the monarchy the biblical material takes an important place in attempts to reconstruct its emergence. Texts such as I Samuel 8.5; 10.19 in which the elders ask Samuel for a king imply the introduction of kingship was a complete break with what had gone before, and the standard hypothesis regarding the introduction of the monarchy also regards it as a distinct break with premonarchic tradition. The emergence of the monarchy is also attributed to the external pressure of the Philistines (8:10.1; 11-15) and many traditional and some more recent theories of state formation also represent the introduction of the moanrch as a reaction Philistines pressure. A. Kuhrt as an example of more a recent study of Israel, argues that at some point before the emergence of the monarchy segmentary groups linked together to form tribes and these tribes in turn also united together to form a inter-tribal federation, which held their meetings at sanctuaries dedicated to their God Yahweh. Ultiamtely Kurht argues, due to the constant external threat presented, for example, by the Edonmites, Ammonites and the Philistines a charismatic leader emerged or saviour-Judge whose function was to protect the tribes from all crisises. The monarchy emerged due to the national crisis created by Israels defeat at the hands of the Philistines and their loss of the Ark at Aphek. The need arose therefore, for a continuous leadership which was acceptable to all and from this arises Saul who proves his ability for kingship through his charismatic leadership in war.7 The older more traditional accounts of Israels history also present the rise of the monarchy in this fashion, for example, S. Herrmann in A History of Israel in Old Testament Times is typical of this view: All this confirms the common view that the monarchy was a late phenomenon in Israel, forced on it by historical circumstances and essentially alien to its original nature.8 Although on many points M. Noth and J. Bright disagree widely they both too account for the emergence of the monarchy as a reaction the external threat of the Philistines which threatened the existence of Israel itself. Bright tries to reconcile the conflicting notions that although foreign to Israel their monarchy was unique to them,9 which according to R. B. Coote K. W. Whitelam (CW) reveals the fundamental methodological problem common to all traditional histories of early Israel, in that not one is capable of accounting for social change. Other scholars such as Soggin, Mendenhall and Gottwald although quite critically of the biblical accounts they are also unable to explain social change in Israel by no other method but external forces. Therefore, their views on the rise of the monarchy do not deviate significantly from the standard approach, although Gottwald purports however, that the Philistine influence was as only one of many factors contributing to the social changes in Is rael.10 On the whole however, many traditional and some more recent models of state formation in Israel present the monarchy as an alien institution. CW point out that care has to be taken when using biblical texts as historical data especially in relation to the rise of the monarchy (I Samuel 8-12) as this is written from a Deutrononmitic standpoint which reinforces the prophetic view that the monarchy was an alien institution.11 CW goes on to argue: It is not sufficient to assume the existence of the monarchy as some kind of alien institution, but rather to ask how and why the transition occurred.12 They also emphases the need to address the continuities between premonarchic Israel and that of the state, without which one cannot make sense of the development of the monarchy.13 Premonarchic Israel according to CW was a segmentary society made up of a loose federation of groups or tribes, so the question is therefore, what were the internal circumstances that made the fragmented occupants of Canaan accept the leadership of a king. According to CW the best approach to the origin of the state is to adopt the method advocated by Cohen. He proposes that the prestate polities like the chiefdoms had a tendency to fission when subjected to a certain levels of friction, and that states were only formed when fission was unacceptable or impossible or where a particular group gained the advantage over the others by opening up their resources. Cohen goes on to question what then were the factors which made the premonarchic groups of Israel fuse into to a state rather than breaking up.14 CW suggests that Carneiros circumscription theory may help to explain the processes that led to an Israelite state in the early Iron Age. Circumscription which means to enclose, is according to Carneiros theory a combination of environmental and/or social practices which can counter any tendency for a society to fission. Israels position in the central highland of southern Palestine was circumscribed by environmental factors such as arid steppe lands and desert, and such environmental factors were important influences in how the peoples in these areas adapted to these conditions. The Israelites were also socially circumscribed by lowland city states, the assault of nomadic raiders and the Philistines from the coast. Therefore, according to CW through a combination of this environmental and social circumscription also other internal and external factors the Israelite state was formed, and as such the rise of the monarchy was not an alien institution: the Monarchy was not a paradox, as has been intimated, but the result of the same major shift in highland infrastructure that marked the success of Israels emergence.15 F. S. Frick also argues that the tribal society of premonarchic Israel may have suffered from continous social disintegration through their inability to absorb large groups of outsiders as they were seem as a threat to the tribes constitutions and culture. The chieftain he continues emerged through the desire to incorporate and avoid social fission, the position of which represented stability through the presence of a permenent political structure.16 Service questions how a chiefdom can be discriminated from a state, but Frick argues that even within a Chiefdon fission can occur although this is rarer than in a segmentary soceity.17 According to CW over a long period of time and through a lengthily train of events and changing circumstances the hill country and the Palestian margins were changed from a decentralised area of low production and low military costs, to an area of institutionalised intensification over which the monarchy ruled, and the reasons for this shift were numerable. Israel emerged in the midst of a decline in trade but made us of the developing economic base of agriculture. Commitment to agriculture encouraged settled village life rather than social disintegration, as terrace farming and tree crops particulary demanded long term investment, commitment and residential stability.18 F. S. Frick argues that this agricultural intensification necessitated the development of specialisation for more labour efficiency, and that a hierarchical organisation or chiefdom emerged when the labour needs required an efficiency beyond what could be supplied by the household or residential group. So in order to avoid social disintegration the chief would direct and organise exchange between the differing sections of society which insured the stability of production.19 The developing intensification of agriculture therefore it is suggested led to the implementation of a hierarchical structure which gave rise to the chief. The implication of which suggests a social stratification within premonarchic Israel as opposed to the strict egalitarian society suggested in Biblical narratives. CW suggest however, that there are indications of social stratification in the stories of the Judges, for in many places there are stories of rich rulers or chiefs. With such literature as already signified care has to be taken with the Deuteronomistic bias, but scholars such as Halpern still consider it evidence of stratification in early Israel. Frick identifies Saul and David as chiefs, and it is speculated by W. Richter when Samuel (1 Samuel 9-10.16) uses the term nagid or prince when anointing Saul, argued that nagid was the successor to the saviour figures or Judges of the premonarchic period but more significantly Schmidt argues that nagid was referring to a chief of the tribal militia.20 CW maintain therefore, that the monarchy arose based upon an already existent social structure, which had been in place and developed from Israels emergence.21 Frick continues that the adoption of chiefdoms and their use of clientship, that is those who are dependent upon the chief and loyalty is to him, by tribal Israel was the first step to centralisation. Loyalty Chief may occur because they are successful in obtaining and distributing resources, because they are successful as leaders in war, or because they are successful in being viewed as charismatic persons. The appointment of non kin rather than relatives was also a vital step towards statehood as this created a central beaurocracy in which membership depended on loyalty to the one who did the appointing, rather than family ties.22 Archeological evidence has also served as evidence of the rise of a centralised state, and according to Ahoroni the emergence of fortified sites such as Tel Ira and Negev were in a very different vein than what had gone before it, the understaking of which would have required a centralised political adminstation of a monarchy.23 Centralisation according to CW could have been a ploy of a elite minority to preserve the power that their developing wealth had created. Bibilical material also seems to reflect a struggle between the wealthy landowners and the pooerer villages represented by the rural priesthood. This might help to explain the bias of the priesthood against the monarchy in for example, I Samuel 8-12. The monarchy therefore may have been the means whereby an emergent upper class exacted the costs of national defence from the villages and smallholders whilst also controlling internal trade. Frick also argues that centralisation also gave the incentive to wage war , but the latter also necessitated for a strong military leadership and an efficient admistrative machine in order to perform the functions of taxing in order to keep a standing army. To conclude, the biblical texts on one hand present the monarchy as being an alien institution and a break with premonarchic Israel. Recent theories on state formation however believe this to be a fallacy, although modern scholars such as Kurht argue that state formation in Israel was primarily due to the external pressure of the Philistines. It is argued however, that the monarchy was not a break with any pre-state tradition, but the result of a natural evolution and social change within Isrealite soceity due to social and enviromental circumscription, which may have possible been spurred on at the last due to external pressure. The evidence of a standing army in the biblical accounts, for example is suggestive of the existence of a developed machine in which taxes could be collected to maintain it. If such as machine existed this is indicative of a developing centralised authority, something which could not be created over night through the whims of the people for a king. Could, however, such a sophisticated organisation have existed prior to the monarchal age in the midst of the mostly troublesome Israelite tribes? It has been suggested the monarchy came about through the ploy of an elite minority and in this sense Sauls enthronment could not be seen as a popular choice, but perhaps it was made acceptable by attributing his kingship to divine will. Sauls enthronment may have occured through a personality cult For is Saul is to be seen as a chief, which Frick suggests he may have been, loyalty was gained by clients through many chracteristics but partcularly their charamatic leadership and their ability in war. This is particularly siginificant to the rise of Saul for through his ability in war against the Ammorites he gained the allegiance of the Israelites and was proclaimed king at Gilgel.

New directions for incarcerate essays

New directions for incarcerate essays Over the years AIDS and HIV within correctional facilities has been researched over and over. Most research attention has been directed towards male inmates, however incarcerated women is the fastest growing infected group. For this reason I chose to summarize this chapter. In the past correctional facilities tend to segregate the poor, drug users and the violent from the rest of society. This segregation still applies with todays correctional facilities. Inmates in these facilities have always faced serious medical threats. This too is still accurate to this day. The one major difference I found in the twenty- first century and the past is that most people in these facilities today will live among mainstream society again. Many of these people will have serious and contagious diseases such as AIDS and HIV without knowing much if any about the disease and the disease prevention. Women that are considered to be high risk for AIDS and HIV are considered to be drug users, poor women and women of color. These groups are concentrated in correctional facilities. Heterosexual women make up the largest growing group to be infected with HIV. Women that are in correctional facilities are often overlooked by researchers and not included in AIDS literature. AIDS is said to be one of the main causes of death in correctional facilities because many inmates do not know they have the disease. AIDS is also the third leading cause of death among all U.S. women between the ages of 25 and 44. Women who are intravenous drug users or who have sex with male drug injectors are more at risk than other women are. Expenses are a major factor in the care for women with AIDS and HIV in correctional institutions. The medical expenses associated with caring for HIV inmates are very expensive. Correctional budgets have been hit hard by the cost of new treatment. The yearly cost of treating a patient infected with HIV ranges anywhere...

Macrophagesâ€Germ-Eating White Blood Cells

Macrophages- Germ-Eating White Blood Cells Macrophages are immune system cells that are vital to the development of non-specific defense mechanisms that provide the first line of defense against pathogens. These large immune cells are present in nearly all tissues and actively remove dead and damaged cells, bacteria, cancerous cells, and cellular debris from the body. The process by which macrophages engulf and digest cells and pathogens is called phagocytosis. Macrophages also aid in cell mediated or adaptive immunity by capturing and presenting information about foreign antigens to immune cells called lymphocytes. This allows the immune system to better protect against future attacks from the same invaders. In addition, macrophages are involved in other valuable functions in the body including hormone production, homeostasis, immune regulation, and wound healing. Macrophage Phagocytosis Phagocytosis allows macrophages to get rid of harmful or unwanted substances in the body. Phagocytosis is a form of endocytosis in which matter is engulfed and destroyed by a cell. This process is initiated when a macrophage is drawn to a foreign substance by the presence of antibodies. Antibodies are proteins produced by lymphocytes that bind to a foreign substance (antigen), tagging it for destruction. Once the antigen is detected, a macrophage sends out projections which surround and engulf the antigen (bacteria, dead cell, etc.) enclosing it within a vesicle. The internalized  vesicle containing the antigen is called a phagosome. Lysosomes within the macrophage fuse with the phagosome forming a phagolysosome. Lysosomes are membranous sacs of hydrolytic enzymes formed by the Golgi complex that are capable of digesting organic material. The enzyme content of the lysosomes is released into the phagolysosome and the foreign substance is quickly degraded. The degraded material is th en ejected from the macrophage. Macrophage Development Macrophages develop from white blood cells called monocytes. Monocytes are the largest type of white blood cell. They have a large, single nucleus that is often kidney-shaped. Monocytes are produced in bone marrow and circulate in the blood anywhere from one to three days. These cells exit blood vessels by passing through blood vessel endothelium to enter into tissues. Once reaching their destination, monocytes develop into macrophages or into other immune cells called dendritic cells. Dendritic cells aid in the development of antigen immunity. Macrophages that differentiate from monocytes are specific to the tissue or organ in which they reside. When the need for more macroghages arises in a particular tissue, the residing macrophages produce proteins called cytokines that cause responding monocytes to develop into the type of macrophage needed. For example, macrophages fighting infection produce cytokines that promote the development of macrophages that specialize in fighting pathogens. Macrophages that specialize in healing wounds and repairing tissue develop from cytokines produced in response to tissue injury. Macrophage Function and Location Macrophages are found in almost every tissue in the body and perform a number of functions outside of immunity. Macrophages aid in the production of sex hormones in male and female gonads. Macrophages assist in the development of blood vessel networks in the ovary, which is vital for the production of the hormone progesterone. Progesterone plays a critical part in the implantation of the embryo in the uterus. In addition, macrophages present in the eye help to develop blood vessel networks necessary for proper vision. Examples of macrophages that reside in other locations of the body include: Central Nervous System- Microglia are glial cells found in nervous tissue. These extremely small cells patrol the brain and spinal cord removing cellular waste and protecting against microorganisms.Adipose Tissue- Macrophages in adipose tissue protect against microbes and also help adipose cells to maintain the bodys sensitivity to insulin.Integumentary System- Langerhans cells are macrophages in the skin that serve an immune function and aid in the development of skin cells.Kidneys- Macrophages in the kidneys help to filter microbes from blood and aid in the formation of ducts.Spleen- Macrophages in the red pulp of the spleen help to filter damaged red blood cells and microbes from blood.Lymphatic System- Macrophages stored in the central area (medulla) of lymph nodes filter lymph of microbes.Reproductive System- Macrophages in gonads aid in sex cell development, embryo development, and the production of steroid hormones.Digestive System- Macrophages in the intestines monitor the en vironment protecting against microbes. Lungs- Macrophages present in the lungs, known as alveolar macrophages, remove microbes, dust, and other particles from respiratory surfaces.Bone- Macrophages in bone may develop into bone cells called osteoclasts. Osteoclasts help to break down bone and to reabsorb and assimilate bone components. Immature cells from which macrophages are formed reside in non-vascular sections of the bone marrow. Macrophages and Disease Although a primary function of macrophages is to protect against bacteria and viruses, sometimes these microbes can evade the immune system and infect immune cells. Adenoviruses, HIV, and the bacteria that cause tuberculosis are examples of microbes that cause disease by infecting macrophages. In addition to these types of diseases, macrophages have been linked to the development of diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Macrophages in the heart contribute to heart disease by aiding in the development of atherosclerosis. In atherosclerosis, artery walls become thick due to chronic inflammation induced by white blood cells. Macrophages in fat tissue can cause inflammation which induces adipose cells to become resistant to insulin. This can lead to the development of diabetes. Chronic inflammation caused by macrophages can also contribute to the development and growth of cancer cells. Sources: White Blood Cells. The Histology Guide. Accessed 09/18/2014 (histology.leeds.ac.uk/blood/blood_wbc.php)The Biology of Macrophages - An Online Review. Macrophage Biology Review. Macrophages.com. Published 05/2012 (macrophages.com/macrophage-review)